|
|
|
Untitled Document
|
Combination with insecticides |
|
Materials of this chapter were also published in:
- Zlotnikov A.K. Assessment of Albit efficiency
in the system of field crops protection against insects / A.K. Zlotnikov,
A.T. Podvarko, T.A. Ryabchinskaya, N.A. Kudryavtsev, K.M. Zlotnikov,
I.M. Khanieva // Zemledelie. – 2017. – ¹ 4. –
P. 37-42. (In Russian)
- Podvarko A.T. Impact of the biopreparation Albit on the resistance
of agricultures towards pests / A.T. Podvarko, T.A. Ryabchinskaya,
N.A. Kudryavtsev, A.K. Zlotnikov, K.M. Zlotnikov // Vladimirskiy Zemledelets
(Vladimir’s agriculturist). – 2017. – ¹ 1 (79). – P. 29-32. (In Russian)
- Zlotnikov, A.K. (2007) Efficiency of Albit jointly used with insecticides
on canola. / Zlotnikov A.K., Sergeev V.R., Begunov I.I., Lebedev V.B.
// Plant protection and quarantine. Nr. 8, p. 40
- Biostimulant Albit for increasing yields and protection of agricultures
against diseases, A.K. Zlotnikov, Ed. Prof. À. Melkumova. All-Russia Institute
of Plant Protection, Russia, 2006
Albit is well-applicable in combination with insecticides,
that visibly reduces insecticide-induced stress effect on treated plants.
Insecticides are group of pesticides used to control insect pests. Generally,
insecticides are united with acaricides (pesticides against pathogenic mites),
since they have the same mechanisms of action. Thus, this group of pesticides
can be called insectoacaricides. Sometimes, term 'insecticide'
is used as short form of 'insectoacaricide'. Like fungicides and herbicides,
insecticides cause considerable stressful effect on plants, that leads to yield
losses and decreased yield quality (for example, decreased gluten content). For
example, application of insecticide in LLC Agrofirma Anyak
(Republic of Tatarstan, Aktanysh region) on the rape var. Ratnik (2010)
induced burns, brown and necrosis of leaves, significant growth retardation.
After Albit application the stress effect of the insecticide was removed. According
to Xiao et al. [1], after application of herbicides, fungicides and insecticides
the intensity of photosynthesis in plants reduces by 44-129%, 21-35%, 36-81%,
respectively. Organophosphate insecticides may cause plant burns in conditions
of open solar insolation [2]. The phytotoxic effect of insecticides based on
dinitroorthocresol and 2,4-dinitro-6-methylphenol is specifically used to inhibit
the growth of orchards and vineyards (“inhibition of growth”). However, overdose
of these products may cause burns of leaves and buds and even destroy the garden
[3].
Efficiency of Albit/insecticide combinations was demonstrated in field trials
carried out by farms of Krasnodar and Stavropol krais, Vladimir, Nizhniy Novrorod
and Rostov oblasts, All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection All-Russia Institute
of Biological Plant Protection and Scientific Agricultural Institute of South-East.
The results of successful application of Albit with insecticides in farms of
Latvia, Romania, USA, Czech Republic, Switzerland were obtained (Table 2).
Albit was used with insecticides based on imidacloprid, alpha-cypermethrin,
beta-cypermethrin, deltamethrin, dimethoate, difenoconazole, carbofuran, lambda-cyhalothrin,
malathion, tebuconazole, thiamethoxam, fipronil, fludioxonil, cypermethrin
and others. There have been no
cases of incompatibility or decreased efficiency of insecticides used
jointly with Albit yet.
Currently, agricultural manufacturers are forced on using more and more of
insecticides, in spite of their stressful effects. With the lapse of time,
insect pests injure cereal crops more and more. This in jury is not just the
mechanical damage of plants: insects (for example, aphids of cereals and swedish
fly) are also carriers of viral diseases. It was especially actual in Russia
in 2005, when many farmers had to use insecticides for the first time so save
yield. Combinations of Albit with insecticides (for example, with diazinon
and deltamethrin based ones against cereal aphids and cereal leaf beetle) were
also tested.
Apart from the anti-stress effect, the adding of Albit to insecticides
enhances their protective effect. Plant immune system is universal
and ensures resistance both to biotic (bacteria, fungi, arthropoda pests)
and abiotic stresses (extreme temperature, humidity, radiation, pesticide
stress). Immunizers causing plant resistance to one pathogens, sometimes
can cause cross resistance to another. Biopreparation Albit consists of
metabolites of rhizosphere bacteria and has immunizing, adaptogenic, growth-stimulating
effects, and antistress activity. Field trials with the biopreparation on cereals
(oats, winter wheat), canola, fiber flax in 2006-2012 revealed protective activity
of Albit against several species of plant pests. It was established that seed
treatment and foliar spraying with Albit increased resistance of
oats to Oscinella frit L., Eurigaster
integriceps Put., Agromiza mobilis Mg., Phyllotreta vittula Redt.
(at biological efficacy level 27–71 %), fiber flax – to Aphthona euphorbiae Schr.
(21.1 %), wheat – to Haplothrips tritici Kurd. (19 %), canola – to Phyllotreta
nemorum L., Thysanoptera (imago) and Plutella maculipennis Curt.
(from 10 to 16.6 %). Albit application in tank mix with insecticides positively
influenced not only on biological efficacy of insecticides (efficacy
of insecticides increased by 20 % on average), but also on crop yield (increase
by 7 to 28 % as compared to pure insecticide). The obtained data allow to conclude
that application of Albit with insecticides can be used in minimal recommended
or, in some cases, reduced dosages (by 20-25%). This makes it possible to reduce
the chemical load on plants while preserving the protective effect. For yield
increase and disease resistance, application of Albit with 100% recommended
dose of insecticide is also advisable [4].
One good example of such combination efficiency is joint application of Albit
with lambda-cyhalothrin based insecticide on spring wheat and barley in Pushkinskoe
experimental farm (Nizhniy Novgorod oblast) against leaf miners and flea beetles.
Area of field, used in the trial, exceeded 2000 hectares; in 2004 the insecticide
was used alone, in 2005 – in combination with Albit. Despite possible differences
in plant’s response in different years, one can note positive tendency. Albit
did not decreased efficiency of the insecticide, but, due to its immunizing
activity, it reduced yield losses caused by diseases (Table 15). Owing to Albit,
total yield losses caused by pests and diseases were reduced by 30% (wheat)
and 32% (barley) on average. These values almost twice exceeds average yield
increase provided by pure Albit on these cultures (16-18%). Therefore, obtained
effect might be created also by antistress activity of Albit.
Table 1. Yield losses of cereals caused by diseases
and insect pests due to application of lambda-cyhalothrin based insecticide
alone (2004) and in combination with Albit (2005) (Pushkinskoe experimental farm)
Crop |
Yield losses caused by diseases(Helminthosporium rot, powdery
mildew, rusts, root rots), % |
Yield losses caused by insect pests (leaf miners, flea beetles), % |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
Spring wheat (var. Tulaykovskaya, Kurskaya) |
36–43 |
7–10 |
10–15 |
10 |
Spring barley (var . Ataman , Prima Belorussii) |
35–45 |
6–11 |
8–10 |
5–12 |
It is well known, that application of insecticides against corn-bug suppresses
plant growth, transportation of photosynthesis products, reduces synthesis
of gluten in grain, decreases yield quality. Combination of insecticides with
Albit abolishes this effect, that leads to increase of gluten content in grain
by 1.2-4.6% comparing to variant treated with insecticide only. In Rostov oblast
(1999-2004) Albit was successfully used in combinations with insecticides against
shield-backed bugs in EC stages 50-69. Application of such combination provided
abolishment of plant growth suppression effect and stable yield of 45-49 centners/hectare
contained 26-29% of gluten having Gluten Deformation Index of 65-95.
High effectiveness of Albit/malathion-based insecticide combination was demonstrated
in trial carried out by Vladimir Regional Plant Protection Station on white
cabbage (2004).
Albit used in combination with thiamethoxam based insecticide (against Colorado
beetle) did not decrease insecticide’s effectiveness (All-Russia Institute
of Plant Protection); in contrary, application of the combination even increased
total effect of insecticide on yield, possibly, due to relieving insecticide’s
toxic influence on plants. Thus, yield increase due to treatment with the insecticide
only was 10.6%, whereas treatment with Albit/insecticide combination provided
yield of 18.5%. Analogous data on potato were obtained by All-Russia Institute
of Plant Protection in experiments on fipronil based insecticide in 2003.
According to data of Scientific Agricultural Institute of South-East (2005,
2006), All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection (2006) and All-Russia Institute
of Biological Plant Protection (2006), the highest yield increase due to Albit/insecticide
application is demonstrated by canola.
In trials, insecticides based on alpha-cypermethrin, deltamethrin and beta-cypermethrin
were used on winter and spring canola starting from coming-up until beginning of flowering
to control bugs, blossom beetle, turnip sawfly, red turnip beetle, cabbage
white butterfly, cabbage moth and cabbage stem flea beetle. Addition of Albit
to insecticides did not decrease insecticide’s efficiency; instead, it visibly
increased yield of seeds and oil output.
A field trial was conducted on spring canola var. Tavrion with
using a modern insecticide (a.i. 250 g/kg deltamethrin) and Albit (All-Russia
Institute of Biological Plant Protection, Krasnodar, 2011-2012). Level of pest
infestation of canola plants corresponded to average long-term values. The
average density of the most harmful pests per 1 m2, such as Phyllotreta
nemorum L., Thysanoptera (imago) and Plutella maculipennis Curt.
was 10, 40 and 3 pcs., respectively. The treatment was carried out in the following
variants: only insecticide at the flowering stage, tank mix of Albit + insecticide
at the flowering stage, Albit at the stem elongation stage with the following
spraying with insecticide at the flowering stage, and only Albit at the stem
elongation stage or at the flowering stage as appropriate controls. The insecticide
was used in dosages of 15-22.5-30 g/ha (50-75-100% of the recommended dose),
Albit - 60 mL/ha.
Results of field trial shown that sprayings with insecticide, Albit and their
tank mixes were effective against pests. It should be noted a nonspecific effect
of pure Albit (variants of treatments of canola plants with pure Albit at the
elongation and flowering stages). In this case Albit had effect on the resistance
of plants to many pests. For example, biological efficacy (BE) of Albit in these
variants against P. nemorum, thrips (imago) and P. maculipennis was
10-20%, 12.5-15% and 16.6%, respectively. BE of 100% recommended dose of insecticide
(30 g/ha) against many pests was 95-100% (Fig. 1). The most significant decrease
of many pests was observed in variant with Albit + insecticide than in variant
with pure insecticide application. Efficacy of combined application of 75% insecticide
dose in tank with Albit was 89-99%, and 75% insecticide dose with preliminary
Albit treatment was 88-100%, that practically did not concede the using of a
full insecticide dose. Overall, Albit significantly increased the effectiveness
of reduced dosages of insecticide by 14-36% against many pests. Albit compensated
not fully a significant reduction of insecticide dosage (by 50%) (Fig. 1).
In addition to increasing insecticide efficacy and reducing its stress effect
on plants, Albit with insecticide had a significant positive effect on canola
yield (Fig. 2). The yield increase was 3.7 - 5.0 centner/ha
than in variants with pure insecticide application (antidote effect was 18.5-28.6%).
The increase of canola yield in variants with Albit + insecticide was also
noted in the earlier field trials of All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection in 2007 [5].
Fig. 1. Biological efficiency of canola plants spraying
with insecticide based
on deltamethrin and its combinations with Albit against a complex of pests
(All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant Protection, 2012)
Fig. 2. Effect of insecticide treatment based on deltamethrin
and its combinations with Albit on the yield of spring rape (All-Russia Institute
of Biological Plant Protection, 2012)
In 2011-2012 Albit and tank mix Albit + insecticide (a.i. deltamethrin) were
applied on the winter wheat var. Bat’ko (All-Russia Institute
of Biological Plant Protection). Biological effectiveness of preparations against
pests, as well as their effect on yield and biochemical parameters of grain
were assessed. The number of larvae of wheat thrips (Haplothrips tritici Kurd.)
in one spikelet of winter wheat reached 100 pcs. On 3d day after treatment,
the average number of thrips larvae in the spike in the control was 105 pcs.
The number of thrips larvae in the spike decreased by 19% after treatment with
pure Albit (40 mL/ha). The biological effectiveness of insecticide in tank
mix with Albit increased by ca. 20% (Fig. 3). At the same time, effectiveness
of minimal recommended dosages of insecticide 20-30 g/ha with Albit was almost
inferior to maximal dosage of insecticide 40 g/ha.
Fig. 3. Biological efficiency of treatments of winter wheat with insecticide
and insecticide + Albit against thrips larvae (All-Russia Institute of Biological
Plant Protection, 2012)
Adding of Albit to insecticide had positive effect on yield. In variants with
insecticide + Albit the yield of winter wheat was by 7.2-7.6% higher than in
variant with pure insecticide (Fig. 4). The gluten content in
flour in variants with Albit increased by 2-4%, in grain - by 1.4-3%; the content
of starch - up to 3.5% and protein - up to 1.0%. In these variants the highest
economic effect (pure income) was 1551-2905 rubles/ha.
Fig. 4. Influence of treatments with insecticide and insecticide + Albit on
the yield of winter wheat (All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant Protection,
2012)
Results of this and also all field trials on joint application of Albit and
insecticides are summarized in table 2.
Table 2. Antidote activity of Albit with insecticides in field trials
Nr |
Active ingredient of used insecticide |
Application rate of the
insecticide, L/hectare
(t) * |
Application rate of Albit, L/hectare (t) |
Crop |
Yield in var.
with
insecticide,
centners/
hectare |
Yield in var. with
insecticide+
Albit, centners/
hectare |
Antidote effect
(Yield increase in Albit/
insecticide treated
var. over insecticide only
treated var.),
centners/
hectare |
Antidote effect, % |
Location of field trial, year |
Comments * |
1. |
– |
– |
0,035 |
winter canola |
– |
– |
4,0 |
– |
Steiner Rudolf Farm, Switzerland, 2011-2012 |
V |
2. |
alpha-cypermethrin |
0,15 |
0,05 |
spring canola |
35,3 |
41,3 |
6,0 |
17,0 |
All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection,
Voronezh region, 2006 |
V |
3. |
beta-cypermethrin |
0,3 |
0,05 |
spring canola |
12,5 |
15,6 |
3,1 |
24,8 |
Agricultural Scientific Institute of South-East,
Saratov region, 2005 |
V |
4. |
beta-cypermethrin |
0,3 |
0,03 |
spring canola |
10,2 |
16,7 |
6,5 |
63,7 |
Agricultural Scientific Institute of South-East,
Saratov region, 2006 |
V |
5. |
beta-cypermethrin |
0,3 |
0,05 |
spring canola |
10,2 |
17,8 |
7,6 |
74,5 |
Agricultural Scientific Institute of South-East,
Saratov region, 2006 |
V |
6. |
beta-cypermethrin |
0,3 |
0,07 |
spring canola |
10,2 |
19,7 |
9,5 |
93,1 |
Agricultural Scientific Institute of South-East,
Saratov region, 2006 |
V |
7. |
beta-cypermethrin + dimethoate |
6,0 + 1,2 |
0,04 |
onion |
170,0 |
200,0 |
30,0 |
17,6 |
Collective farm
Kim V.À., Rostov region, 2006 |
V
accompanied with herbicidal (trifluralin) and fungicidal (mancozeb + dimethomorp)
treatments |
8. |
deltamethrin |
0,02 |
0,04 |
winter wheat |
39,5 |
42,5 |
3,0 |
7,6 |
All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection, Krasnodar krai, 2011-2012 |
V |
9. |
deltamethrin |
0,03 |
0,04 |
winter wheat |
39,5 |
42,5 |
3,0 |
7,6 |
All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection, Krasnodar krai, 2011-2012 |
V |
10. |
deltamethrin |
0,04 |
0,04 |
winter wheat |
41,5 |
44,5 |
3,0 |
7,2 |
All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection, Krasnodar krai, 2011-2012 |
V |
11. |
deltamethrin |
0,015 |
0,06 |
spring canola |
17,5 |
22,5 |
5,0 |
28,6 |
All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection, Krasnodar krai, 2012 |
V |
12. |
deltamethrin |
0,0225 |
0,06 |
spring canola |
18,5 |
23,5 |
5,0 |
27,0 |
All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection, Krasnodar krai, 2012 |
V |
13. |
deltamethrin |
0,03 |
0,06 |
spring canola |
20,0 |
23,7 |
3,7 |
18,5 |
All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection, Krasnodar krai, 2012 |
V |
14. |
deltamethrin |
0,3 |
0,03 |
winter canola |
13,0 |
15,5 |
2,5 |
19,2 |
All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection, Krasnodar krai, 2005-2006 |
V |
15. |
deltamethrin |
0,3 |
0,04 |
winter canola |
13,0 |
16,0 |
3,0 |
23,1 |
All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection, Krasnodar krai, 2005-2006 |
V |
16. |
deltamethrin |
0,3 |
0,06 |
winter canola |
13,0 |
18,0 |
5,0 |
38,5 |
All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection, Krasnodar krai, 2005-2006 |
V |
17. |
deltamethrin |
0,3 |
0,06 |
winter canola |
11,3 |
13,5 |
2,2 |
19,5 |
All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection, Krasnodar krai, 2006-2007 |
V
accompanied with herbicidal agent |
18. |
Imidacloprid + tebuconazole |
2,0 |
0,04 |
winter wheat |
80,40 |
85,50 |
5,1 |
6,3 |
Agricultural Research and Development Station
Secuicni-Neamt, Ðóìûíèÿ, 2015-2016 |
P |
19. |
carbofuran |
20 |
0,1 |
sugar beet |
217,8 |
265,5 |
47,7 |
21,9 |
All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection
Voronezh region, 2005 |
P
presowing treatment was performed 1 week before sowing |
20. |
carbofuran |
20 |
0,1 |
sugar beet |
217,8 |
255,0 |
37,2 |
17,1 |
All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection
Voronezh region, 2005 |
P
presowing treatment was performed 4 weeks before sowing |
21. |
carbofuran |
20 |
0,03 |
sugar beet |
337,3 |
378,8 |
41,5 |
12,3 |
All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection
Voronezh region, 2004 |
P |
22. |
carbofuran |
20 |
0,05 |
sugar beet |
337,3 |
501,3 |
164,0 |
48,6 |
All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection
Voronezh region, 2004 |
P |
23. |
carbofuran |
20 |
0,1 |
sugar beet |
337,3 |
880 |
542,7 |
160,9 |
All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection
Voronezh region, 2004 |
P |
24. |
carbofuran |
20 |
0,03 |
sugar beet |
311,3 |
369,0 |
57,7 |
18,5 |
All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection
Voronezh region, 2003 |
P |
25. |
lambda-cyhalothrin |
0,2 |
0,04 |
winter wheat |
35,2 |
42,3 |
7,1 |
20,2 |
All-Russia Institute of Biological Plant
Protection, Krasnodar krai, 2006-2007 |
V
accompanied with herbicidal agent |
26. |
lambda-cyhalothrin |
0,15 |
0,04 |
winter wheat |
54,2 |
54,9 |
0,7 |
1,3 |
Krasnodar Regional Plant Protection Station
/ Agrofarm “Agrokomplex”, 2006-2007 |
V
accompanied with herbicidal and fungicidal agents |
27. |
lambda-cyhalothrin |
0,15 |
0,04 |
winter wheat |
45,0 |
47,8 |
2,8 |
6,2 |
Krasnodar Regional Plant Protection Station
/ Agrofarm “Agrokomplex”, 2005-2006 |
V
accompanied with herbicidal agent |
28. |
lambda-cyhalothrin |
– |
0,04 |
winter wheat |
– |
Application of Albit decreased total yield
losses caused by diseases and pests from 52% to 18% |
– |
71,0 |
Pushkinskoye experimental farm,
Nizhniy Novgorod region, 2004-2005 |
V |
29. |
lambda-cyhalothrin |
– |
0,04 |
winter wheat |
– |
Application of Albit decreased total yield
losses caused by diseases and pests from 54 % to 17 % |
– |
80,0 |
Pushkinskoye experimental farm,
Nizhniy Novgorod region, 2004-2005 |
V |
30. |
lambda-cyhalothrin |
– |
0,04 |
spring barley |
– |
Application of Albit decreased total yield
losses caused by diseases and pests from 43 % to 12 % |
– |
54,0 |
Pushkinskoye experimental farm,
Nizhniy Novgorod region, 2005 |
V |
31. |
lambda-cyhalothrin |
– |
0,04 |
spring barley |
– |
Application of Albit decreased total yield
losses caused by diseases and pests from 56 % to 23 % |
– |
75,0 |
Pushkinskoye experimental farm,
Nizhniy Novgorod region, 2005 |
V |
32. |
malathion |
1,2 |
0,05 |
white cabbage |
280,0 |
320,0 |
40,0 |
14,3 |
Vladimir Regional Plant Protection Station,
2006 |
V
accompanied with herbicidal agent |
33. |
malathion |
– |
0,05 |
white cabbage |
300,0 |
350,0 |
50,0 |
16,7 |
Vladimir Regional Plant Protection Station,
2004 |
V |
34. |
thiamethoxam |
– |
0,04 |
peanut |
35,48 |
37,83 |
2,4 |
6,6 |
Sunbelt Ag Exposition, Georgia, USA, 2013 |
P |
35. |
thiamethoxam |
0,2 |
0,05 |
potato |
103,5 |
110,9 |
7,4 |
7,1 |
All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection
Voronezh region, 2004 |
P |
36. |
thiamethoxam |
– |
0,04 |
sunflower |
18,4 |
22,1 |
3,7 |
20,1 |
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra,
Slovakia, 2013 |
P |
37. |
thiamethoxam |
– |
0,3 |
sunflower |
29,4 |
31,5 |
2,1 |
7,1 |
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra,
Slovakia, 2014 |
P |
38. |
thiamethoxam |
– |
0,04 + 0,05 |
soybean |
19,7 |
25,8 |
6,1 |
31,0 |
Sunbelt Ag Exposition, Georgia, USA, 2013 |
P |
39. |
thiamethoxam + difenoconazole + fludioxonil |
1,8 |
0,1 |
rice |
56,2 |
60,8 |
4,6 |
8,2 |
All-Russia Institute of Rice, Krasnodar krai,
2015 |
P
insecticidal agent |
40. |
thiamethoxam + difenoconazole + fludioxonil |
0,9 |
0,1 |
rice |
56,2 |
61,7 |
5,5 |
9,8 |
All-Russia Institute of Rice, Krasnodar krai,
2015 |
P
insecticidal agent |
41. |
fipronil |
0,02 |
0,05 |
potato |
362,0 |
406,0 |
44,0 |
12,2 |
All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection
Voronezh region, 2003 |
V |
42. |
cypermethrin |
0,2 |
0,04 |
winter wheat |
55,0 |
55,9 |
0,9 |
1,6 |
Krasnodar Regional Plant Protection Station
/ Agrofarm “Agrokomplex”, 2006-2007 |
V
accompanied with herbicidal and fungicidal agents |
43. |
cypermethrin |
– |
0,06 |
spring canola |
25,0 |
30,0 |
5,0 |
20,0 |
z/s Vaiculevas, Latvia, 2010 |
V |
(-) no data
* – insecticidal seed treatment agent
Thus, based on field trial data of many years, it can be
concluded that Albit boosts the level of resistance of
cereals, legumes, potato, vegetable and other crops towards insect
pests by ca. 20%. By the same degree, biological efficacy
of insecticides increases.
In the variants with tank mixes of insecticide + Albit yield
increases by 29.4% than in variant with pure insecticide (the average value of antidote effect for
all field trials, please, see in Table 2).
Albit is officially patented as a
product for reducing the phytotoxic effect of insecticides on crops [5].
LIST OF REFERENCES
- Xiao J.X., Huanga Y.Y., Wanga L., et al. Pesticides-induced depression
of photosynthesis was alleviated by 24-epibrassinolide pretreatment in Cucumis
sativus L. // Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. – 2006. – V. 86 (1).
– P. 42-48.
- Catalog of preparations 2015. Plant Protection Products. MTS “Agro-Alliance”.
2015. p. 80-81 (in Russian)
- Guide of agrarian. Special issue of newspaper “Land and Life of the SFD”.
2016. p. 31-32 (in Russian)
- Zlotnikov A.K. Assessment of Albit efficiency in the system of field crops
protection against insects / A.K. Zlotnikov, A.T. Podvarko, T.A. Ryabchinskaya,
N.A. Kudryavtsev, K.M. Zlotnikov, I.M. Khanieva // Zemledelie
(Agriculture). – 2017. – ¹ 4. – P. 37-42. (In Russian)
- Zlotnikov A.K. Efficiency of Albit in combined use with insecticides on
canola / A.K. Zlotnikov, V.R. Sergeev, I.I. Begunov, V.B.
Lebedev // Zashchita i Karantin Rastenij (Plant Protection and Quarantine).
– 2007. – ¹ 8. – P.40. (In Russian)
- Zlotnikov À.Ê. Patented invention No. 2518252 “Antidote
composition of biological origin for use in crop production”/ À.Ê. Zlotnikov,
K.M. Zlotnikov, I.Ê. Zlotnikovà, S.À. Pavulsone // Priority
dated 03.12.2012., issued 08.04.2014 (in Russian)
|
|